How do you decide what you enjoy? What does "enjoy" mean, anyway?
Which leads me to the related questions: Why do we engage with art? What do we get out of it?
I am quite obsessed with this as an issue. I spend a huge amount of time and money on music. I love music. I can talk about my favourite bands all day. But my engagement with it is shallow, in terms of how well I can talk about it: I don't understand music in a technical way, even though I think it engages me both intellectually and emotionally. What am I getting out of it?
(I love dancing, by the way. You might not think that. I rarely go to clubs. But I absolutely love dancing. I used to go to loads of club nights at university and just immerse myself in the music, especially the beats and basslines. Now it's restricted to the kitchen while I'm washing up. I don't really like dancing at weddings or parties, mind.)
And recently I've got back into reading science fiction books. I love science fiction, too. Again, though, my engagement is shallow: I know about its history, general themes, I can recognise writers and styles, but I don't theorise deeply about its deeper meanings. I'm happy to just chat about it. (Though I did write a dissertation on JG Ballard and William Burroughs once.)
On the non-art side, I enjoy gardening a lot. I can lose myself when I'm out in the garden, pruning, weeding, sowing, just looking and smelling and hearing the garden around me. I think that is one of my purest enjoyments; I particularly enjoy it because I don't feel I have to intellectualise it. Maybe that's my problem with engaging with art, I think too much about it. Isn't that the point?
I've excluded familial relationships and friendships from this monologue: I don't so much enjoy these, as experience joy (and pain) because of them. Is this the same as enjoyment?
I've also excluded computers. As I work with them all the time, I have a love/hate relationship with them. I can't make a blanket statement that I enjoy programming. Often I don't. Sometimes I find it intensely frustrating and limiting. Other times I find it mind numbing. Then other times I get so engrossed that hours pass without me moving to eat or go to the toilet. It's one of those things.
I suppose what I'm getting at is: I don't feel I have a deep love for any hobby or pastime. Perhaps rather than "love" I should say I don't feel consumed by anything, or driven, or ambitious, or even that passionate. Should I be? Does it matter if I'm not? Is it just the time of year? Maybe I watch people on TV culture shows too much and think I should be able to intelligently discuss my experience of the world, the same way the participants on those programmes do. Perhaps I should just relax.
What do you enjoy, by the way?
(Now I've written all this, I'm not even sure why I did it. Perhaps it's because I've spent the whole day listening to Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark, a band I love and have done for 20 odd years. It made me wonder what it is about music that I like so much. And why I place so much importance on a person's music taste as a measure of their personality. I probably shouldn't, but I do.)
Comments
I enjoy watching TV
I love watching TV whenever i get time, and reading books.
hello my friend there are
hello my friend
there are diffrent situation in which diffrent things we like ....
situation makes that what we like at that time
I love the beach and music -
I love the beach and music - I really like local original bands
I love
I love icecream, I love music, I like riding my bike, I love fresh air, I love flowers ...and I really love my husband!
Enjoying/ engaging
Y'know, this consumes a fair portion of my contemplation time also. What is art? How do we enjoy it? Is art that you merely skim the surface of really art? Or is it only art if it moves you? I used to believe that if the piece needed explanation then it was poor art. Effectively I often dismissed things that did not have an aesthetic (good or bad) and inevitably that just excused my lack of effort in trying to understand the piece. So then I thought perhaps all art is good, you just have to interpret it your own way; art is in the interpretation. Now I am leaning back to the original thinking in that, explanation or not, good art engages the audience - catches the eye/ear/mind. Art can 'just' be beautiful or it can have a 'message', perhaps it has to change you.
Much of this thinking was spurred by my sister becoming a full-time artist. As a physicist much of my peer group dismissed art as pretentious or easy or a waste of time ("They only have to study 6 hours a week for art, what a worthless degree!"). I knew my sister worked hard, agonised over each piece, and produced stunning paintings that I was loathe to dismiss as worthless. These days I have a healthy mix of artists and scientists in my peer group. One thing we all agree on quite frequently is that a lot of 'art' is pretentious rubbish. So then it comes back to the personal experience. If it moves you. I get this sensation from music, paintings, poetry, sci-fi, science, food, movies, games, company, living, breathing.
I think that partly answers the 'why do we engage with it' question. Interpreting, re-interpreting, experiencing changes me and helps me understand myself and others. The good stuff anyway.
Ha, I sound pretentious!
PS With all this in mind, my drawing class has some pieces up. (http://www.ccae.org/events/DRFH/) It's not a gallery, it's a corridor. Some of the drawings I love, but I couldn't tell you exactly why. Does this fit my criteria for good art?
Nice long comment there. I
Nice long comment there.
I like pretentious art. There, I've said it. Well, I suppose I should qualify that: I like art about art, or the process of creation, meta-art, conceptual art, that kind of thing. While I appreciate a fine painting as much as the next person, I suppose my deepest engagement is with the more cerebral sorts of art. I love work that makes me think about whether it is art or not. To me, that makes it even more "arty".
I also like difficult music. I do actually like it, too, I don't just say that to be smart. I listen to it through choice when I'm on my own in the car, for instance. I like being perplexed and surprised, and always have. I suppose that's what the best science fiction does: presents something strange and marvellous, and gradually reveals it to you; the very best present the marvellous and make it more marvellous as the story progresses, more surprising. Maybe I just crave novelty: neophilia, I think someone once called it. And I think the extraordinary casts light on the ordinary: science fiction lays out scenarios and ideas which put a magnifying lens over aspects of normal existence. I just love it.
I've been reading a traditional novel this week (Saturday by Ian McEwan), which, while very well-written with excellent characterisation, is a bit on the dull side plot-wise. Maybe it will pick up. Maybe the day to day ponderings of a neurosurgeon just aren't interesting enough. Time will tell. I'm much happier with a bit of sci fi.
Nice drawings by your class. I like your face-only portrait best. It reminds me of something, but I can't quite place it. The pose reminds me of the Statue of Liberty.